Milorad Popović Critiques Montenegro’s Political Climate

Milorad Popović, a prominent Montenegrin writer, expressed deep concern over the current political climate in Montenegro, where he claims that nationalist sentiments are once again gaining momentum. In a recent interview with the Bosnian newspaper Slobodna Bosna, Popović reflected on the troubling parallels between today’s governance and the turbulent 1990s, when minority groups faced significant persecution.

Popović’s remarks were prompted by a video featuring the mayor of Pljevlja who, representing the ruling pro-Russian party Nova srpska demokratija, was seen making derogatory comments about Bosniak citizens. The writer stated, “I am ashamed that our country is ruled by nationalists and incompetents. I felt the same shame in the 1990s when the regime persecuted Bosniaks, Albanians, Croats, and even Montenegrins.”

The writer emphasized that the political landscape in Montenegro surprises only those unfamiliar with the historical relations between Montenegrins and Serbs. He pointed to a longstanding conflict starting as far back as 1907 with the assassination attempt on King Nikola of Montenegro, highlighting a persistent struggle between advocates of a “Greater Serbia” and the Montenegrin identity, which has fought for survival.

Popović articulated that Serbian nationalism, akin to Russian nationalism, carries a messianic impulse, asserting that Serbs have a divine right to dominate other nations. This ideology, he claims, has led to devastating consequences, including the disintegration of Yugoslavia, hundreds of thousands of deaths, and ethnic cleansing campaigns. “Despite being defeated in four wars, Serbia remains unyielding in its imperial ambitions.”

Reflecting on the resilience of Serbian nationalism, Popović noted, “The idea is persistent, rooted in the belief that Serbs are a chosen people.” He pointed out that during the 1990s, Montenegrins shared the fate of Bosniaks and Albanians, who were also targets of this aggressive nationalism. Today, he believes that Bosniaks and Albanians in Montenegro are among the most endangered groups.

He criticized the political maneuvers of Bosniak and Albanian parties, suggesting that they have aligned themselves with clerical-fascist elements and nationalists who deny Montenegro’s sovereignty. Popović views this collaboration as a betrayal to the fundamental rights of Montenegrins and an undermining of the country’s statehood.

The writer posed a concerning question about the ability of Bosnia and Herzegovina to withstand the onslaught of Greater Serbian aspirations. He acknowledged the ongoing internal conflicts within the Serbian political sphere but warned that they remain united in their strategic interests regarding Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Popović asserted, “The situation in Montenegro is dire. The societal climate is worse than it was in the 1990s.” He drew parallels between the current government and historical autocracies, suggesting that the ruling coalition is reminiscent of a form of governance where public dissent is stifled.

He noted that the aftermath of the 2020 elections sparked significant protest movements across Montenegro, yet these protests ultimately dissipated due to a lack of cohesive leadership from opposition parties. Popović criticized these factions for prioritizing personal gain over national integrity, leading to an environment where the ruling party could collaborate with nationalist factions without challenge.

The writer further lamented the cultural and intellectual stagnation within Montenegro, calling attention to the absence of critical thought and the inability of intellectual elites to challenge the prevailing nationalist narratives. He observed that Montenegro, despite its nominal independence, operates under a regime that uses populism and opportunism to maintain control.

Popović concluded by advocating for the formation of a broad, national organization that would unify pro-Western elements in Montenegro and abroad to effectively resist the threats posed by Greater Serbian nationalism. He believes that only through a cohesive strategy can Montenegro hope to safeguard its constitutional values and foster a political environment conducive to peace and democracy.

The urgency of Popović’s message reflects ongoing concerns about the fragility of democratic institutions in Montenegro and the potential resurgence of historical conflicts in the region.