Connect with us

Lifestyle

Montenegro Minister Addresses Legalization Deadline Concerns

Editorial

Published

on

Montenegro’s Minister of Spatial Planning, Slaven Radunović, recently addressed concerns regarding the legalization deadline for illegal constructions during a parliamentary session. Responding to questions from Nađa Laković, a representative from the PES party, Radunović clarified that the deadline for submitting the necessary documentation primarily affects illegal builders whose structures are not officially registered.

The ongoing discussions in the Montenegrin Assembly have highlighted the complexities surrounding property legalization. Radunović noted that there is a significant distinction between burdens registered on an entire building versus specific parts. “We are seeking solutions to this issue,” he stated, emphasizing the need to differentiate between various ownership and construction scenarios.

Radunović indicated that he had heard of an initiative from the Association of Municipalities suggesting a six-month extension for the deadline. “We will consider this request,” he added. The current legalization period is not strictly limited; it is defined by the operational capabilities of the Office for the Legalization of Illegal Structures, which will function for a total of five years.

He reassured those seeking legalization that they have ample time, saying, “There is no reason for those who wish to legalize their properties not to do so within the five-year timeframe.”

In addressing the plight of residents in apartment buildings, Radunović explained the process that follows an application for legalization. If a unit within a building lacks a usage permit but is otherwise compliant, the commission will investigate any burdens on the building. If the burden is found to be associated with the developer or construction company, the unit’s owner will be permitted to proceed with legalization.

This approach, according to Radunović, aims to ensure fairness in the legalization process. He emphasized the need for documentation from a geodetic organization to accompany requests for legalization, marking it as the only requirement in this legislative process. He noted that this applies to properties identified in the orthophoto recordings from July 2023.

During the session, MP Oskar Huter pressed Radunović on the fairness of the Law on Legalization of Illegal Structures for citizens. Radunović responded by acknowledging the challenges faced by those who adhered to legal construction processes while others built illegally. “We have attempted to find a solution that satisfies both parties,” he said. “Those who need to legalize must pay. Illegal builders had a significant advantage, constructing whenever and however they pleased.”

Huter reminded Radunović of a promise made during the 2018 election campaign, where he committed to free legalization for primary structures. Radunović replied that this commitment was contingent on his election victory. He reiterated his stance on equitable enforcement, stating, “If demolitions occur, they will affect everyone or no one.”

The discussions in the Assembly reflect the ongoing challenges Montenegro faces in addressing illegal constructions while ensuring fairness for all property owners. As the government navigates these complex issues, the outcomes will significantly impact many citizens and the housing landscape in Montenegro.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.