Billie Eilish Slams Elon Musk Over Wealth Inequality and Responsibility

Billie Eilish has publicly criticized Elon Musk, labeling him a “f*cking pathetic p*ssy b*tch” in response to his immense wealth as he approaches trillionaire status. This condemnation was shared on her Instagram Stories on November 13, 2025, reflecting a growing discontent among young voices regarding wealth inequality.

Eilish’s remarks were accompanied by infographics from the activism group My Voice, My Choice, which highlighted how Musk’s projected fortune could be redirected to humanitarian efforts. According to the data, his wealth could potentially eradicate world hunger by 2030, requiring approximately £30 billion annually, provide universal access to clean water for about £1 billion over seven years, and invest $1.5 billion per year to save endangered species. Eilish emphasized Musk’s personal responsibility in addressing these global challenges with her bold statement.

The context of Eilish’s outburst is linked to a recent Tesla compensation plan. In October 2025, over 75 percent of Tesla shareholders approved a compensation package for Musk that could be valued at up to $1 trillion, contingent on ambitious performance targets. These include raising Tesla’s market capitalisation to £6.46 trillion ($8.5 trillion) and the sale of millions of vehicles, among other goals. Although Musk has not yet achieved trillionaire status, critics, including Eilish, argue that the discussions surrounding his potential wealth should prompt serious moral considerations.

Eilish’s Instagram comments followed her previous remarks at the WSJ Magazine Innovator Awards, where she was honored with the Music Innovator Award on October 29, 2025. During her speech to a room filled with billionaires, including Mark Zuckerberg, she questioned the rationale behind extreme wealth: “If you’re a billionaire, why are you a billionaire? … Give your money away, shorties.” At the same event, late-night host Stephen Colbert announced that Eilish would donate £8.7 million ($11.5 million) from her tour to support initiatives focused on food equity, climate justice, and environmental causes.

Eilish’s critique taps into a larger conversation about wealth distribution and its implications for society. As discussions about Musk’s potential fortune intensify, public figures and activists are increasingly challenging whether such vast resources should be harnessed for societal benefit rather than personal accumulation. Eilish’s message resonates within a broader context of rising inequality, as the staggering sums that Musk could command starkly contrast with global issues such as hunger, environmental degradation, and geopolitical instability.

The response to Eilish’s remarks has been significant, with various media outlets highlighting her willingness to confront wealth disparity directly. Critics of Musk’s $1 trillion pay deal have noted that the performance goals set by Tesla appear aggressive and speculative, prompting discussions about whether such compensation is justified or merely a gamble on future success.

As of now, Musk has not publicly responded to Eilish’s statements. Her pointed critique of his wealth accumulation underscores a growing impatience with the hoarding of wealth among billionaires and calls for a reallocation of resources to address pressing global crises. The ongoing dialogue surrounding wealth inequality continues to gain traction, emphasizing the need for responsible stewardship of financial resources in combating societal challenges.