Indigenous Leader Ignites Controversy by Burning Australian Flag

A First Nations man named Moojidji set the Australian flag on fire during an Invasion Day rally in Brisbane on January 26, 2026. His actions, which took place at Queens Gardens, have ignited significant controversy as Indigenous leaders and political figures react to the event. Despite public outcry, police have confirmed that no charges will be filed against Moojidji.

While addressing the gathered crowd, Moojidji expressed that the flag burning was a deliberate act aimed at challenging Australia’s legal legitimacy. He articulated that the Australian flag “doesn’t represent all of us,” emphasizing that the demonstration was about asserting sovereignty against what he described as an “illegal entity of law.” The crowd responded with cheers as the flames engulfed the flag, only to be extinguished moments later.

The incident drew swift condemnation from various political leaders, including Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister Patrick Gorman. He stated, “The overwhelming majority of Australians have no time for this divisive behaviour,” underscoring the importance of treating national symbols with respect. Gorman also noted that actions associated with flag desecration could be considered an offence under certain circumstances.

The federal government reiterated its disapproval of flag desecration, with One Nation leader Pauline Hanson labeling Moojidji’s actions as “un-Australian.” She expressed her disappointment, saying, “They can’t change history. No one can but we must unite. We’re all Australians.”

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley also weighed in, asserting that the flag should not be subject to “redefinition by anyone.” Ley criticized the recent failed attempt in parliament to ban flag burning, stating, “The Liberal Party moved to ban flag burning because we believe our national symbols deserve protection and respect.”

Yet, not all responses were negative. Greens councillor Trina Massey defended Moojidji’s actions, arguing that the Indigenous community should have the right to express themselves on a day that many consider a day of mourning.

The incident aligns with broader sentiments in Australia regarding national symbols. A poll from the Institute of Public Affairs conducted in August 2025 revealed that 77 percent of Australians believed that burning the national flag should be illegal. Among respondents aged 18 to 24, this figure was slightly lower at 76 percent. Furthermore, 63 percent of Australians indicated that individuals who burn the flag should face imprisonment.

Daniel Wild, Deputy Executive Director of the IPA, commented on the poll results, asserting that Australians are united in their pride for the flag. He emphasized that, while freedom of speech and peaceful protest are fundamental rights, the desecration of national symbols should not be tolerated.

On the day of the rally, tensions escalated as Queensland Police had to separate protesters when individuals carrying Australian flags approached the Invasion Day event. Police intervened as confrontations arose, with some rally attendees expressing their disapproval vocally.

The events of the Invasion Day rally underscore the ongoing complexities surrounding Australia’s national identity and the perspectives of its Indigenous population. As discussions continue, the response to Moojidji’s actions may further influence public discourse regarding national symbols and Indigenous rights in Australia.