Connect with us

Politics

SNP MSP Kevin Stewart Proposes Removal of Monarchy Oath

Editorial

Published

on

Scottish National Party (SNP) Member of the Scottish Parliament (MSP) Kevin Stewart has launched a motion to eliminate the oath of allegiance to King Charles III within the Scottish Parliament. This proposal follows Grenada’s recent decision to remove a similar oath from its national Parliament. Stewart’s initiative seeks to shift the allegiance of MSPs from the British monarchy to the people of Scotland.

In a post on social media platform X, Stewart stated, “Grenada has decided to drop the oath of allegiance to the King. Isn’t it time that Scotland followed their lead?” His motion emphasizes the notion that Scotland’s Parliament should empower its members to pledge their loyalty to the people rather than an unelected monarch. The text of the motion reads: “That the Parliament commends Grenada’s reported decision to drop the oath of allegiance to the British crown and replace it with a pledge of allegiance to Grenada; recognises that the people of Scotland are sovereign, and believes that Scotland’s Parliament should have the power to follow Grenada’s lead.”

Under the Scotland Act 1998, all Members of the Scottish Parliament are required to take an oath of allegiance or make a solemn affirmation before participating in parliamentary activities. Stewart’s motion could lead to a significant discussion in Holyrood if it garners enough support, although any resulting vote would lack the power to alter existing laws regarding the oath.

In response to Stewart’s proposal, Murdo Fraser, a Scottish Conservative MSP, criticized the move as “shameless,” suggesting it is an attempt to appeal to republican sentiments both within and outside the SNP. Fraser remarked during an interview with GB News that the monarchy remains a cherished institution in Scotland. He stated, “Most people will wonder why nationalist MSPs are focusing on this constitutional navel gazing at a time when they should be tackling the real priorities of Scots.”

Fraser emphasized that the Scottish Government should concentrate on pressing issues such as reducing NHS waiting times, stimulating economic growth, and improving educational standards rather than engaging in what he termed “petty student politics.”

Stewart’s motion reflects a growing conversation about the role of monarchy in modern governance, particularly in regions with strong national identities. Discussions surrounding this topic may continue as Scotland navigates its relationship with the British crown amidst calls for greater autonomy and self-determination.

As the debate unfolds, the outcome of Stewart’s motion could serve as a pivotal moment for Scottish parliamentary practices and the ongoing dialogue about national identity in the context of the monarchy. The discussion not only highlights the divide between different political factions in Scotland but also raises broader questions about the future of parliamentary oaths and national allegiance.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.