UK Government Revisits Compensation for 1950s Women

The UK Government has announced a review of its previous decision to deny compensation to women born in the 1950s, a move that has been cautiously welcomed by campaigners. Pat McFadden, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, addressed the House of Commons, stating that new evidence had emerged which was not available to former Pensions Minister Liz Kendall when she decided in December 2024 to reject the Ombudsman’s compensation recommendations for these women.

Campaigners from Ceredigion Preseli, particularly those affiliated with Ceredigion Preseli Women Against State Pension Injustice, regard this development as a significant shift. Pamela Judge, the group’s Co-ordinator, expressed cautious optimism, highlighting that the evidence referenced by McFadden is not new. It derives from research commissioned by the Department for Work and Pensions in 2007.

The 2007 study contradicts previous claims made by the government, specifically the assertion that women affected by the state pension age changes would not have read or understood letters informing them of these changes. Judge emphasized that the research indicates these women would likely have comprehended the contents of personalized communications regarding their state pension status.

A critical Judicial Review is scheduled in the High Court for December 9 and 10, 2024. This timing has prompted the government to reconsider its earlier stance, acknowledging that its previous decision may not withstand legal scrutiny. As a result, campaigners feel they are now in a position akin to that of a successful outcome from the planned review.

Local Member of Parliament, Ben Lake, expressed his support for the government’s decision to reassess its compensation stance. He noted the profound impact of the pension changes on thousands of women, who have experienced significant hardship due to the lack of financial support. Despite this progress, Lake cautioned that the government has yet to provide concrete commitments for compensation. He emphasized the urgent need for certainty for those affected after years of unmet expectations.

As the situation develops, the outcome of the Judicial Review and the government’s final decision on compensation will be closely monitored by campaigners and affected individuals alike. The welfare of these women remains a pressing issue, and many are hopeful that this renewed examination may lead to a fair resolution.