Connect with us

Science

Study Reveals First Human Kiss Dates Back 21 Million Years

Editorial

Published

on

Research conducted by the University of Oxford indicates that the first human kiss may have occurred as far back as 21 million years ago. This study suggests that early interactions between our ape ancestors and Neanderthals included not just mating but also affectionate behaviors such as kissing. While it has long been established that Homo sapiens and Neanderthals interbred, this new research points to a more complex social relationship than previously understood.

Kissing is seen in various animal species, but its evolutionary purpose has puzzled scientists. It is a behavior that can facilitate the spread of disease without providing clear reproductive or survival advantages. The Oxford-led study, published in the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour, marks the first comprehensive effort to analyze the evolutionary history of kissing through the lens of the primate family tree.

Dr. Matilda Brindle, the lead author and an evolutionary biologist at Oxford’s Department of Biology, stated, “This is the first time anyone has taken a broad evolutionary lens to examine kissing. Our findings add to a growing body of work highlighting the remarkable diversity of sexual behaviors exhibited by our primate cousins.”

Kissing may have been a common practice among early humans and Neanderthals, who cohabited Europe for a span of 2,600 to 5,400 years until the latter’s extinction around 40,000 years ago. Prior studies suggested that modern humans shared oral microbes with Neanderthals, indicating potential saliva transfer through interactions such as food sharing or chewing. This latest research proposes that these interactions extended to kissing.

The study defined kissing as non-aggressive, mouth-to-mouth contact that did not involve food transfer. It included various primates, such as chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans, which have all been observed engaging in kissing behaviors. The researchers treated kissing as an evolutionary trait, mapping it onto the primate family tree and running complex models to estimate the probability of kissing behaviors among different extinct ancestors. This involved simulating the model 10 million times to achieve accurate estimates.

Co-author Professor Stuart West emphasized the significance of integrating evolutionary biology with behavioral data. “By integrating evolutionary biology with behavioral data, we’re able to make informed inferences about traits that don’t fossilize – like kissing. This lets us study social behavior in both modern and extinct species,” he explained.

While the study offers insights into how kissing may have evolved, the researchers caution that it does not clarify the reasons why animals engage in kissing. They suggest that kissing might have originated from grooming behaviors or mothers feeding their young. Nonetheless, understanding the evolution of kissing adds a fascinating dimension to our comprehension of social interactions in both contemporary and ancient species.

This groundbreaking research opens the door for further exploration into the complexities of human behavior and its roots in our evolutionary history.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.