Connect with us

Business

Trump Administration Seeks 10% Stake in Thacker Pass Lithium Project

Editorial

Published

on

The Trump Administration is pursuing a 10% equity stake in the Thacker Pass lithium project, a significant move aimed at bolstering the United States’ critical minerals supply chain. This initiative reflects a broader strategy to reduce reliance on China for essential materials used in defense, military, and battery technologies. According to sources familiar with the negotiations, this potential investment in Lithium Americas Corp. is part of ongoing discussions regarding a $2.26 billion loan from the U.S. Department of Energy intended for the Thacker Pass project.

Located in Humboldt County, Nevada, the Thacker Pass project is poised to play a crucial role in establishing a domestic battery supply chain. The project aims for mechanical completion by late 2027 and is expected to produce 40,000 tonnes per year of battery-quality lithium carbonate. Once operational, Thacker Pass is projected to significantly increase U.S.-sourced lithium production, potentially boosting output nearly tenfold over current levels.

The administration’s interest in securing a stake follows a broader trend of federal engagement in critical mineral projects. An official from the White House emphasized President Trump’s support for the Thacker Pass initiative, stating, “He wants it to succeed and also be fair to taxpayers.” The official also noted the importance of fiscal responsibility, remarking, “But there’s no such thing as free money.”

In response to the news of the Trump Administration’s interest, shares of Lithium Americas surged by 80% in after-hours trading on Tuesday. This spike mirrors the market reaction seen earlier in the year when MP Materials Corp., a U.S. rare earths miner, announced a public-private partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense. This collaboration aims to develop a complete domestic rare earth magnet supply chain, with the Department of Defense set to become MP Materials’ largest shareholder with a 15% stake.

The shift towards direct federal investment underscores the administration’s urgency in securing a reliable domestic supply of critical minerals. Currently, China dominates the global supply chain for these essential resources, particularly in mineral processing and magnet production. The International Energy Agency (IEA) has warned that the concentration of critical mineral supply in a few countries, especially China, poses risks of market disruptions.

According to the IEA’s annual 2025 report, China accounts for approximately 70% of the market share for 19 out of 20 minerals analyzed. The report highlights concerns over price volatility, with three-quarters of these minerals exhibiting greater fluctuations than oil. The situation is compounded by China’s export controls, which could lead to “painful disruptions” in the market.

While the current market remains well-supplied with critical minerals, the IEA points out that the real issue lies in the concentration of production among a select few producers. By pursuing equity stakes and supporting U.S.-based projects, the Trump Administration aims to mitigate these risks and enhance national security through a more resilient and independent resource supply chain.

The Thacker Pass project represents a pivotal step in this direction, potentially transforming the landscape of U.S. lithium production and positioning the country to compete more effectively in the global market for critical minerals.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.