Connect with us

Sports

Shedeur Sanders Faces Controversy After Preseason Struggles

Editorial

Published

on

Shedeur Sanders, the rookie quarterback drafted by the Cleveland Browns in the fifth round of the 2025 NFL Draft, has found himself at the centre of controversy following a challenging performance in the team’s preseason finale against the Los Angeles Rams. During this game, Sanders completed only three of six passes for a mere 14 yards and was sacked five times, including a particularly punishing 24-yard sack that has drawn widespread criticism.

This performance has led to speculation regarding the Browns’ handling of Sanders, with some suggesting that he may have been set up to fail. The narrative gained traction after the game, where visible frustration was evident on Sanders’ face when he was replaced late in the fourth quarter by Tyler Huntley, who subsequently led the team to a winning drive. Sanders remarked that he did not initially realize he had been taken out, indicating a desire to continue playing.

Criticism and Support for Sanders

Despite a rocky preseason, Sanders concluded the series with 17 completions on 29 attempts, accumulating 152 yards and two touchdowns. However, his five sacks in the final game raised alarms about both the team’s offensive line protection and his own ability to navigate the pocket effectively. In the aftermath, former NFL star Eric Dickerson suggested that the league might have deliberately suppressed Sanders’ draft stock to “make an example” of him, further fueling the allegations of sabotage.

Fan reactions to Sanders’ performance have been sharply divided. Supporters tout his accolades, including recognition as the 2024 Big 12 Offensive Player of the Year during his collegiate career at Colorado. Conversely, critics have mocked his struggles, coining nicknames such as “Shedont Sanders.” The viral clip of his 24-yard sack has intensified discussions on social media, with searches for terms like “Shedeur Sanders worst play” surging.

While conspiracy theories about intentional sabotage attract attention, many analysts have dismissed these claims as unfounded. Outlets like Dawgs By Nature characterized such theories as “daft,” emphasizing that the NFL benefits from promoting emerging talent rather than undermining it. Most experts agree that Sanders’ challenges are more likely related to his need for improved pocket presence, timing, and adjustment to professional defenses.

Future Prospects for Sanders

As the preseason concludes, Sanders is expected to start the regular season as Cleveland’s fourth-string quarterback, positioned behind Joe Flacco, Jameis Winston, and Huntley. Although his immediate playing opportunities may be limited, the Browns appear committed to his development. Executive Vice President Andrew Berry has indicated that the team may carry four quarterbacks this season, which would allow Sanders valuable time to acclimate to the NFL’s pace and complexity.

Whether Sanders can overcome these early career challenges and dispel claims of sabotage remains uncertain. However, his progress will be closely monitored as the 2025 NFL season unfolds, with many eager to see if he can rise to the occasion and fulfill his potential in the league.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.