Montenegro’s Parliament Faces Controversy Over DRI Senate Nominee

Montenegro’s Parliament is currently embroiled in a heated debate regarding the nomination of a new member to the Senate of the State Audit Institution (DRI). On March 12, 2024, Mihailo Anđušić, a member of the opposition, raised concerns in the plenary session about the qualifications of the candidate, Predrag Radunović. Anđušić revealed that although the government insisted Radunović was suitable, the opposition maintained the opposite. Ultimately, Radunović withdrew his candidacy, influenced by suggestions from those who had initially supported him. They recognized that the nomination process had become severely compromised.

The Economic, Finance, and Budget Committee had previously proposed Milan Popović as a candidate for the Senate after Radunović’s withdrawal. The agenda also included a report from the Consultative Hearing of candidates for the DRI Senate, a proposal to amend the Personal Income Tax Law, and a proposal to supplement the Property Tax Law.

During the session, various lawmakers expressed their views on the DRI’s crucial role in overseeing public spending. Vaslije Čarapić, another key figure in the discussion, emphasized that while the DRI is vital for the system, its integrity has been in question. He highlighted that the institution has not been developed with the necessary standards of integrity and impartiality, noting that previous senators have often been politically active, undermining the institution’s credibility.

Čarapić criticized the practice where candidates would withdraw their party memberships just before joining the DRI, effectively securing lifetime positions while favoring individuals from specific political circles. He remarked that the DRI has lacked the “aura” it should possess.

Miloš Konatar, another parliamentarian, pointed out that the DRI is essential for controlling public funds. He lamented that the majority on the committee proposed a candidate who did not meet the qualifications, leading to Radunović’s withdrawal. Konatar urged his colleagues to protect the integrity of the Parliament and the DRI, calling for a re-evaluation of the nomination process.

Boris Mugoša, representing the Social Democrats, voiced concerns about the destructive nature of such proceedings on the overall system. He referenced a letter from Popović, who stated he was not interested in being part of the nomination process, despite being proposed as a candidate. Mugoša speculated that these actions might be intentionally obstructing Montenegro’s European integration efforts, highlighting the significance of appointing a DRI Senate member as a benchmark for Chapter 32 of the accession negotiations.

The session underscores the ongoing challenges faced by Montenegro in ensuring transparent governance and maintaining the integrity of its institutions. As the parliamentary discussions continue, the future of the DRI’s leadership remains uncertain, with calls for a more legitimate and credible process echoing throughout the assembly.